We know that we humans are influenced by our environment. That we are subject to the things we see, hear, and experience. If this weren’t the case then companies wouldn’t be spending billions of dollars on advertising and politicians would immediately stop campaigning. But the continue because they are able to affect our thinking, spending, and our actions.
This is why book bans are becoming more popular. Because books have the power to influence readers in ways that the conservatives don’t like. They encourage independent thinking. Parochial Christian thinking needs to be protected against outside influence or it will fail. It is a delicate thought system that needs constant guarding and reinforcement to survive. It depends on dependent thinkers. But the books they want to ban risk showing readers (Christian children) a world contrary to what their conservative Christian parents taught (indoctrinated) them.
The difference between education and indoctrination is in it’s breath (or focus), and it’s goal. Education presents a wide range of information, much of it contradictory, and expects the student to incorporate it with their previous experiences and come to their own conclusions. Indoctrination presents a narrowly focused set of information designed to lead the student to a target conclusion. Education teaches the student how to think. Indoctrination teaches what to think. Education is about the process. Indoctrination is about the goal.
Both education and indoctrination are ongoing throughout one’s life. Indoctrination needs guard rails on the limits of knowledge for it to survive. This is the purpose of book bans, which are but one small part of the larger thought control system, is to restrict knowledge inconsistent with indoctrination goals and to keep people thinking dependently. Whether it be Christian values, Muslim values, or governmental goals (CCP, North Korea, Russia), indoctrination depends on controlling the flow of information to produce and maintain dependent thinkers.
This is why book bans are necessary: to preserve and advance indoctrination goals. Otherwise people might stray and learn something “harmful” (but true).